TOOT Chalec

RMS, again...

More detailed explanation of why he's got to go:

https://lwn.net/Articles/935305/

RMS, again...

@drewdevault No, the type of demagoguery and vitriol you're spewing is what has to go. It has no place in the world and community. You claim to want a inclusive community, an inclusive movement -- this is not the way to create one. The FSF and the GNU project are doing well _despite_ people like yourself that constantly kick down at all that disagree with you.

RMS, again...

@drewdevault

So you complain about "an exclusionary environment", and then you write: "What's the fucking point of keeping this guy around?"

Don't you see the contradiction here?

I think you need to choose: either you support inclusiveness and accept that people are different, or you explicitly attack certain individuals and try to push them out.

I think it would be better to say who is good and who you want as leader(s) instead of saying who you don't want.

@amszmidt

I have read your blog posts with interest but I find any of RMS's explanations on what free software is, why it should be as it is, what matters and why, a million times more correct and clear than yours. Software project leaders may have technical skills but additional skills are required to lead a political movement. I wish the FSF can find other people able to explain and argue for free software in a way that compares with RMS. Removing RMS without having found such people would be bad. Besides, judging people may not be one of your best skills.
replies
0
announces
0
likes
0